Future of broad human society intricately tied up with wildlife

03Mar 2022
Editor
The Guardian
Future of broad human society intricately tied up with wildlife

NOTHING is easier in psychological terms than marking out the vast chasm separating humans from beasts and, for evident reasons, this mental picture is grossly inaccurate.

In poorer societies humans and some beasts share a household, and no family member can sleep soundly if the animals have had nothing to eat or have eaten too little.

When there is nothing for the animals to eat, what the humans are eating is also on its way to depletion. There is no escaping that reality, in which case marking World Wildlife Day each March 3 is really a moment of reflecting upon ourselves. The wildlife is the alibi, or business, troubling us.

On the whole, domestic beasts are the ones with which humans share lives, but the wildlife environment isn’t all that far from the horizon.

Writing on the theme for World Wildlife Day 2022, an international executive says that tourism has the power to fight for nature.

Justin Francis, the CEO of Responsible Travel, explains in a message how he was happy to see that the theme of the 2022 UN World Wildlife Day, today, relates to ways to recover key species for their restoration in the ecosystem.

It isn’t clear how far Tanzania is involved in the campaign tied up with this theme, but in the Middle East already rhinos are accommodated in private zoos, generated entirely from genetic engineering.

There was a time when there were rare spray toads on some waterfalls at Kihansi in Kilombero District, Morogoro Region – right inside Tanzania – when the hydroelectric power station was being put through the motions before implementation.

Scores upon scores of conservationists wanted to see the land remain intact so that the rare species lay protected.

With genetic engineering, some other conservation spot around the world could get scientists to rectify a few genes to enable the toads to live in altered environment.

Accordingly, they were dispatched to the United States and later returned, but perhaps just a few of them. Actual restoration implies the capacity to widen recovery of the species and enhance its adaptive ability.

Chroniclers say that on December 20, 2013, at its 68th session, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) proclaimed March 3 – the day the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) was signed in 1973 – as UN World Wildlife Day.

That is took a long 40 years from the date of signing the convention to the creation of a memorial day illustrates the challenges being faced, the making of steady progress demanding collective reflection from time to time.

Owing to its fairly vast store of flora and fauna, Tanzania has been hit by contrasting interests and somewhat checkered policy formulations in that area. A ready example is the 2016 order stopping trade in live animals, effectivities of scores of traders.

Painful as such moments are bound to be, the public has generally entrusted public authorities with finding the best way out.

Perhaps the setting up of zoos ought to be encouraged so that entrepreneurs can supplement “official efforts” by breeding wild animals or birds of their choice or those in danger of extinction.

That would be different from, say, merely seeking to obtain an annual licence for a certain quota of exports of flora and fauna already in existence and often understandably feeling threatened.

Top Stories